Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, is at odds with the Canadian government over the proposed Online News Act (Bill C-18).
The legislation, which is currently being considered in the Senate’s Committee on Transport and Communications, would require online platforms like Facebook and Google to pay news publishers for the content shared on their platforms.
Tech corporations could potentially be liable for hundreds of millions of dollars in annual payments to publishers if the bill is enacted.
In response, Meta has threatened to remove news links on its platforms in Canada.
Meta is no stranger to similar legislation. In 2021, the company temporarily blocked Australians from sharing news stories on Facebook in response to a government bill that required Google and Facebook to contribute to journalism.
The move inadvertently limited access to emergency services pages, causing significant backlash.
Meta Canada’s head of public policy, Rachel Curran, has stated that the company has learned from its Australian experience and will be more careful, responsible, and transparent in its actions should Bill C-18 pass.
Meta is no stranger to similar legislation. In 2021, the company temporarily blocked Australians from sharing news stories on Facebook in response to a government bill that required Google and Facebook to contribute to journalism.
Nick Clegg, Meta’s president of global affairs and former U.K. politician, argued in a public statement that the Online News Act is based on a flawed premise.
According to Clegg, Meta does not unfairly benefit from people sharing news content on its platforms; instead, it’s the news sites that need Facebook and Instagram.
He stated that only a tiny proportion (about 3%) of Facebook Feed content is made up of news links, while Meta has generated “more than $230 million” in “free marketing” for news publishers.
Curran reiterated these points during a Canadian Senate committee hearing, asserting that news content has little economic value for Meta.
She said the company is being asked to compensate news publishers for material that doesn’t financially benefit Meta, which is the main problem with the legislation.
The Canadian government has accused Meta of using intimidation tactics in response to potential regulations.
However, Meta maintains that its stance is based on business decisions. Should news content be removed from Facebook and Instagram, some argue it could lead to a rise in misinformation and disinformation as people seek information elsewhere.
Given Meta’s success in Australia, where the company managed to influence a watered-down version of the proposed legislation, it remains to be seen whether the tech giant will achieve similar results in Canada.
Twitter’s rebrand to ‘X’ continues to trigger public outrage as its glowing logo lights up the San Francisco night, raising…
Why did Elon Musk decide to rebrand Twitter as X? Discover the full story of the transition from a popular…
Social media has undeniably become an integral part of our lives, defining our personal and professional identities. Users often…